At first I don´t want to blame anyone
And it wasn´t my fault, it´s a mistake on pcgameshardware´s site,
because they offered Cm10(Beta1)+Cm10.30update to combine them and
there was no chance to see that it´s the beta version and that
it won´t work. It was only marked as Cm10, so from where should
a newby know that ? I don´t agree with your interpretation because
C10Beta1 is anyhow a Cm10 release whatever stands behind
the "Cm10". Cm10Beta1 means it´s just a Cm10 release but not
as ready as the developer thinks it should be.
It makes no sense to call something Cm10Beta1 when the Beta1
means it´s a version before Cm10 as you said.
Then it would be called Cm9,5 or so.
It could be so simply if the description would contain
"Update from (Final)10.xx -> 10.30" or something like this
to prevent confusion.
So Barozi please don´t tease people with useless coments.
You don´t need to agree with my opinion,
but in the future you should better give ideas how
to simply fix the problem instead, thx
